top of page
  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter - Black Circle
  • YouTube - Black Circle

Candid vs Traditional Wedding Photography

Dec 21, 2020
3 min read

Updated: Jun 4, 2021


A wedding is a once in a lifetime experience. People want to remember their special day. Wedding photography is the best way to capture the most wonderful moments of a couples’ life. These days, there is a trend of candid wedding photography which is catching up fast. Though this is the new hip trend, there are many fans for traditional wedding photography.


Expect the unexpected: Candid is always spontaneous

Indian candid photography is a mixture of the old and new. Because it covers a very traditional wedding in a new and different hue. It captures people when they are not aware of their picture being taken. Hence, the name candid. The photographers click pictures without staging a scene. Hence it is natural and brings in a sense of realism. The photographer moves around the wedding area and catches people as they go about the wedding rituals. In fact, it has become popular in recent times in spite of candid photography cost is higher than that of traditional photography.


Traditional is still a trend

In contrast to candid photography, a traditional photography involves sitting down pictures of the people. They are aware that somebody is clicking their picture. This kind of photography is more formal in its approach.


Traditional photography allows the photographer to create the perfect space to take a picture where everyone is giving their best pose. It also means that people can dress up as they wish and give a pose which suits them more.


Candid V/S Traditional photography: the differences

Traditional photography captures events as they are supposed to. The beauty of candid wedding photography lies in the natural reactions of the people. It clicks people in their best emotions and brings out the feelings of that moment through a picture.


In traditional photography, if the photo is of the newlywed couple, then they will be visible clearly. Also, they will be at the center of the picture. This is different from candid photography. There the photographer can decide a unique angle for capturing the couple. He may focus on a scene through a new position. And he can use the light to give a fresh look to the picture. Hence it is more creative.


The technical know-how

There is a difference in the approach of a candid and a traditional photographer. For example, a candid portrait photography will use light and click a person in a more informal tone. The final look of the picture is also dependent on the processing of the images. And of course, it depends on the photographers’ skill too.


The difference between the two forms is in the way both observe a scene needs to be photographed. And also how they want to frame a subject in the picture and click it. The difference could also be in the ambience they prefer and the use of light in them. Though candid Indian wedding photography is in trend, it doesn’t mean that the traditional version is out. There are many fans of traditional photography in India as it has been an accepted for long years now.


In both cases, the results are different. But depending on the photographer’s skill, both styles of photography can give good results. Moreover, some photos are best when they are candid while certain parts of the wedding need traditional photography.


If you liked this post, you should check out our channel Madhurang Studio


Recent Posts

See All

11 Comments


3 wix
a day ago

image 2.6 makes a good point about candid coverage catching people when they aren't aware of the camera, and that sense of realism is what draws a lot of couples to it. I also appreciate that you didn't write off traditional photography as outdated, since those posed family shots still matter to plenty of people. The idea that Indian candid work blends the old and new rings true, because most weddings I've been to end up needing a bit of both.

Like

Jie
Oct 21

ozil-goalai.com makes a good point about Indian candid photography being a mix of the old and new, especially since traditional rituals give photographers so much to work with. The bit about catching people when they aren't aware of the camera is what really separates it from posed shots. Traditional portraits still have their place in the family album, though.

Like

Joey
Sep 15

I've always been drawn to bg remover free for its ability to capture those unposed, genuine moments during a ceremony. The way it catches people as they're naturally going about the rituals, without any staging, really does bring a wonderful sense of realism to the photos. It's a beautiful blend of the old and new, as the article mentions.

Like

Joey
Sep 05

planorial.com explains how candid photography captures those spontaneous, unposed moments. It’s interesting that Indian candid photography is described as a mixture of the old and new. That blend of tradition and a fresh perspective sounds like a great way to tell a couple’s story.

Like

Jay
Jay
Jun 30

I was just looking into this topic for my own wedding and found ZEnhancer super helpful for understanding the differences. It makes sense that candid shots capture more genuine emotion, though I can see the appeal of having those classic posed portraits too. Balancing both styles seems like the way to go.

Like
bottom of page